home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
pc
/
illusion
/
rock_fie.cxt
/
00204_Field_204.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-31
|
2KB
|
52 lines
How, then, are we to
interpret the data accumulated
by anthropologists and
psychologists that are said to
show that people in
technologically backward
societies, who have no
experience viewing pictures,
are incapable of, or extremely
poor at, perceiving pictures as
representations? The answer is
that the data available simply
do not justify that conclusion.
It is undoubtedly true that, on
being shown pictures or even
photographs for the first time,
individuals in certain societies
express puzzlement and often
seem not to recognize what is
represented. But is this
surprising? A picture is itself an
object, a two-dimensional
object at that, with certain
markings on it. Observers must
adopt the pictorial attitude, one
in which they are prepared to
perceive a picture in two
different ways simultaneously.
We are used to doing this, but
the people tested were not. Only
when observers understand
that they must adopt this
attitude can we ask whether or
not they are capable of
recognizing what is depicted.
The evidence available is
unequivocal on this question.
They do recognize people,
animals, and other familiar
objects depicted in drawings
and photographs. Their
interpretation of what is
happening in a picture may
vary from our own--as, for
example, whether a group of
people are dancing or fighting--
but this fact should hardly
surprise us either.
Interpretation on this level
ought to be a function of
cultural background.